Saturday, December 17, 2011 / by Justin Hoffmann
In an ironic twist, there are signs that the wreckage left over from the housing bust may be reigniting dubious real-estate schemes and fraud. According to researchers:
• Property flippers are back in action in places like South Florida and Las Vegas, where condo prices crashed but are now seeing appreciation again in some areas.
• So-called "floppers" are defrauding banks by hijacking short sales at prices below what legitimate purchasers are willing to pay. In these schemes, realty agents obtain fraudulent appraisals to persuade banks to sell houses at below-market prices to investor groups. The investors then flip the houses at fair market prices to ordinary homebuyers and split the quick profits.
• Creative "credit enhancement" companies are "renting" investors the bank-account balances they need to demonstrate to lenders that they have the financial wherewithal to qualify for a mortgage. The accounts are for real, but they don't belong to the loan applicants who claim them. Account names are assigned to applicants — who pay for the service — but they are never allowed access to the money. When mortgage underwriters check to verify the deposits — which are in reality fraudulent sub-accounts — they are told the money is in the name of the loan applicant. One investigator pretending to be a purchaser was verified as having funding available in the amount of $850,000. The loan application was to buy 935 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., in Washington D.C., which is the headquarters building of the FBI.
• Investors are hoodwinking lenders into giving them low down payments and rock-bottom interest rates by lying about their intentions to occupy the property they plan to buy as a principal residence. Some investors consider such dissembling nothing more than a fib, but in reality it's bank fraud. Researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York have documented that widespread falsehoods by investors about occupancy played a major but previously unrecognized role in the real-estate bust.
To Ann Fulmer, a former white-collar-crime prosecutor who is now a vice president with mortgage-fraud analytics company Interthinx, this all amounts to a "past is prologue" situation — the market conditions are ripe for a reprise of some of the worst behavior of the boom and bust.
Her firm's latest study of mortgage fraud nationwide, covering loan origination and other data from the third quarter, found that applicants' dishonesty about their employment and income was up 9 percent from the same period the year before and a stunning 50 percent from the third quarter of 2009. The reason: Borrowers increasingly are falsifying W-2s and other records in order to meet the tougher debt-to-income thresholds lenders adopted after the bust and recession.
Interthinx works with major mortgage lenders to spot fraud and has access to vast loan-application databases, credit-bureau data and other information, and runs it all through proprietary models to establish estimates of fraud risk. For example, when an applicant claims to be purchasing a home as a principal residence, Interthinx pulls credit-bureau files and public records and may find that the applicant already has other homes listed as principal residences. The anti-fraud systems also spot cases where buyers apply to multiple lenders for the same property.
For the sixth straight quarter, the states that Interthinx ranked riskiest for mortgage fraud are the same that experienced the most explosive booms and the most crushing busts between 2004 and 2008: Nevada, Arizona, California and Florida. California alone accounted for half of the 10 highest-risk metropolitan areas in the most recent rankings. Miami-Fort Lauderdale and Cape Coral-Fort Myers, Fla., are high on the list as well. Metropolitan Washington, D.C., which had been ranked sixth in fraud risk earlier this year, dropped to 24th place in the most recent study.
San Jose, Calif., saw a 16 percent jump in "identity fraud" schemes where loan applicants seek — and get — new identities and credit histories good enough to qualify them for mortgages that would otherwise be beyond reach.
Déjà vu? "I wouldn't be surprised," says Fulmer. "There's so much money on the sidelines" looking for high returns in the face of a volatile stock market and low yields on conventional investments. If you have larceny in your heart, mortgages and houses can be tempting targets.
By Kenneth R. Harney